Show Book List

Reviews from Amazon
Amazon.com (0465072720) 18 reviews
Amazon.com (029781740X) 18 reviews
Amazon.co.uk (0465072720) 4 reviews
Amazon.co.uk (029781740X) 4 reviews
Amazon.ca (0465072720) 13 reviews
A selection of these reviews is given below

 

Lynn Margulis

The Symbiotic Planet

Lynn Margulis is probably the person most associated with the development of the theory of symbiosis. In The Symbiotic Planet: A New Look at Evolution she discusses some of the aspects of symbiosis, and how it has shaped life on earth. She explains the development of Serial Endosymbiosis Theory, and goes on to look at the origin of life on earth, and the origin of sex. All the while Margulis emphasises the problems which occur when we insist on thinking of life as consisting of individual organisms, for instance in the way we give them names. The final chapter discusses the planetwide symbiosis known as Gaia.

I felt that the chapters of this book could best be seen as a collection of separate essays, rather than the development of a single thread, which is what I had expected. Possibly more disconcerting is the fact that Margulis always seems to have to be disagreeing with someone. If this had been a book about how she challenged and overcame the forces of orthodoxy then it would have been worth reading, but unfortunately the disagreements tend to take on the form of background noise, which I felt detracted from the rest of the book. But if you don't mind that style of writing then you'll find many interesting ideas in this book.

Amazon.com info
Paperback 176 pages  
ISBN: 0465072720
Salesrank: 180640
Weight:0.36 lbs
Published: 1999 Basic Books
Amazon price $10.17
Marketplace:New from $8.40:Used from $6.96
Buy from Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk info
Paperback 176 pages  
ISBN: 0465072720
Salesrank: 167400
Weight:0.36 lbs
Published: 1999 Basic Bks.
Marketplace::Used from £5.00
Buy from Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca info
Paperback 176 pages  
ISBN: 0465072720
Salesrank: 91338
Weight:0.36 lbs
Published: 1999 Basic Books
Marketplace:New from CDN$ 6.32:Used from CDN$ 25.15
Buy from Amazon.ca

Product Description
Although Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution laid the foundations of modern biology, it did not tell the whole story. Most remarkably, The Origin of Species said very little about, of all things, the origins of species. Darwin and his modern successors have shown very convincingly how inherited variations are naturally selected, but they leave unanswered how variant organisms come to be in the first place.In Symbiotic Planet, renowned scientist Lynn Margulis shows that symbiosis, which simply means members of different species living in physical contact with each other, is crucial to the origins of evolutionary novelty. Ranging from bacteria, the smallest kinds of life, to the largest—the living Earth itself—Margulis explains the symbiotic origins of many of evolution’s most important innovations. The very cells we’re made of started as symbiotic unions of different kinds of bacteria. Sex—and its inevitable corollary, death—arose when failed attempts at cannibalism resulted in seasonally repeated mergers of some of our tiniest ancestors. Dry land became forested only after symbioses of algae and fungi evolved into plants. Since all living things are bathed by the same waters and atmosphere, all the inhabitants of Earth belong to a symbiotic union. Gaia, the finely tuned largest ecosystem of the Earth’s surface, is just symbiosis as seen from space. Along the way, Margulis describes her initiation into the world of science and the early steps in the present revolution in evolutionary biology; the importance of species classification for how we think about the living world; and the way “academic apartheid” can block scientific advancement. Written with enthusiasm and authority, this is a book that could change the way you view our living Earth.
 
A mean-spirited book ***
Margulis is a world class researcher and a scientist who has changed the way we think. However as a summary of her life's work this book makes her seem petty and small. She is dismissive and patronising when she discusses work tha disagrees with her own and often seems to be damning with faint praise. A perfect example is her dismissal of Woess's division of Archaea from Eubacteria. She belittles his division because to her it obscures the importance of the division between eu and pro karyotes (it certainly didn't to me) even though she grudgingly says that it's better than the plant animal dichotomy. Woess's classification is far more reflective of reality than Margulis's, and shows how even for eukaryotes we overestimate the importance of multicellularity as it divides the protozoa which just form one finger in Margulis's classification. There are much better books about symbiosis several of them written by Margulis.
 
Symbiotic Planet (A New Look at Evolution) **
In Lynn Margulis' Symbiotic Planet (A New Look at Evolution), the reader is presented with the author's ideas and theories on evolution in a style that entwines an autobiographical basis into her piece of work as well.
The use of first person throughout the novel personalizes the conversation that the book presents to the reader. Margulis, although only presenting a theory is very unsure and unconfident with her own opinions. She seems to be uncomfortable with presenting her thoughts straight out, and barely attempts to persuade the reader to believe in her theories. When she presents her theories with a very minute attempt to persuade her audience, the book and her ideas become nearly pointless, and bland - for the lack of evidence used to back up the thoughts of the reader.
The book switches back and forth between informational and autobiographical. In the beginning of the book, the small stories the Margulis includes on her history and self-experiences intrigue the reader by adding the attraction that accompanies a story. Yet Margulis takes the story parts of her book too far, and soon her autobiographical accounts become outdated, losing all former interest. Margulis gets caught up in her own life, rather than her theories on life. The stories of the courses she took in college qualify her ability in the subject matter, yet they do nothing to further the purpose and goal of the book. This book comes across as being a book that was written by an author more interested in herself than her theories she was presenting. Only halfway through the book is any relevant information exposed, and even as the reader reaches this point, it quickly rotates back to an autobiographical account on Lynn Margulis.
Margulis presents her readers with fascinating topics that she is well qualified to discuss and propose theories on, yet she fails to effectively present the information. This book would only be of interest to avid fans of Lynn Margulis who wish to learn more on her background, and who thoroughly appreciate her style of writing. Otherwise, Lynn Margulis' Symbiotic Planet (A New Look at Evolution) is not the book for you.
 
World much smaller than ours, yet vital ****
Let's hear it for the bugs-not your creepy-crawlies, but bacteria, the be-all (and possible end-all) of life on Earth, according to Margulis. Here she describes the once radical theory that cells have incorporated bacteria to mutual advantage and uses that as a springboard to summarize a still more radical theory of how species evolve. She calls it serial endosymbiosis theory (SET). It is now conventional wisdom that the energy-producing mitochondria in animal cells were once free-living bacteria. Indeed, they have their own genes-different from nuclear DNA. Margulis provides many examples of fruitful symbioses, including sexual union itself as the merger of sperm and egg cells. According to SET, there are successive steps or mergers that led to multicellular life forms: In steps one and two the oldest bacterial forms-the non-oxygen breathing 'archaebacteria' found in deep ocean vents-merged with swimming bacteria two billion years ago to form the nuclear heart of animal, plant, and fungal cells and provide the cilia for swimming. Later steps introduced a third partner able to breathe oxygen and added the ability to engulf and digest food (phagocytosis). The last step involved engulfing yet another bacterium-but one these various new forms of life could not digest: bright green photosynthetic bacteria. The bone of contention here is the origin of ciliated cells-critical to evolution for their vital role as sperm tails, among other things. Margulis has a theory about their origin, but as they say, more research is needed. Margulis' theory also dictates a change in taxonomy to five kingdoms: bacteria at the base, then 'protoctists' (algae, slimemolds, ciliates) next, and then animals, plants, and fungi. Finally, she defends Lovelock's Gaia theory, which she interprets to mean that enormous interacting ecosystems on Earth achieve homeostasis rather than that the planet is in the hands of some benign Mother Earth. This is vintage Margulis-personal, autobiographical, passionate, argumentative, at times over the top, but full of ideas-at least some of which, in the past, have proved to be right.
 
A cogent--if combative--case for a new evolutionary paradigm ****
If one decides to peruse popular biology books long enough, one quickly becomes conscious of a "theological" nature of the major disputes in evolutionary biology. Darwin is the Bible from which all draw their extensions, and his basic authority is unquestioned; however, there is a good amount of intradisciplinary backbiting and heated discussion over how his legacy should be interpreted. On one hand you have Dawkins and Dennett proclaiming with near-Christian fervor that selection explains everything (even how selection explains the superiority of selectionist as scientists, of course), whereas Behe is busy bursting the bubble of Darwinism to the tune of irreducible complexity, with overt hints that Irreducible Complexity Necessarily Points In The Direction Of A Creator.

In between you have the wonderfully refreshing prose of Lynn Margulis, who thinks both neo-Darwinists and creationists are out to lunch and that they're both missing something important: symbiosis. Whoever said living things couldn't cooperate in addition to competition? Whoever said that individual, smaller organisms couldn't eventually join together to produce a larger, more complex organism that functioned as more than the sum of its parts? Margulis makes a compelling case for both points, interspersed with some personal asides about her own development as a biologist. She is quite refreshing in that she has little use for single-minded reductionism, but at the same time she pointedly refuses to make a case for some addled concept of scientific creationism. Where the former's scope is too narrow, she insists the latter's scope is too broad. Her remarks on the larger implications of symbiosis and Gaia theory make clear that she is not attempting to introduce a teleology or a "God" into the world she is describing; if anything she regards such attempts as misguided anthropocentrism that increasingly has little place the more we learn about our interconnectedness with the rest of the biosphere. Symbiosis theory is a message of hope, but also a blow to the ego of the human species--there is indeed a constructive, integrating factor at work in evolution, but it's not conscious design, and it certainly didn't intend us as the pinnacle of life. The hopeful-yet-unsettling message of Margulis' book is that life constructively gave rise to us in ever-larger forms of integration and symbiosis, but also that life will outlast us if we insist upon destroying ourselves. Bacteria can do it all over again if they need to! Life can adapt to a post-human world; the question remains as to whether or not humans can reverse current trends leading to a post-human world.

 
It fits---it is as simple as that. *****
"Symbiotic Planet" may sound to the average reader like just another attempt to "classify" life on our little Earth. This would be an error. This book, as is typical of Dr. Margulis' writing is precise, complete, and allows the reader to easily follow along this amazing journey through time and life itself. I have read, as well as reviewed a number of Dr. Margulis' books through the years, and stand in awe at how she can "break down" what to myself seems an incredibly complicated idea, into plain common examples. Her writing captivates the mind of the reader, to the point that it seems impossible to put down. I am a very slow reader-yet I finished the book (the first time) in a single day. One cannot stop reading it is just that fascinating! There is little I can say that would be nearly adequate to properly describe this book. The reader will decide for themselves that is really is a great read and a great book to keep as reference. It really is as simple as that.
 
More please ***
Decent easy read. Introduction to the scientific ideas of Lynn Margulis. She pays due respect to the scientists who have helped either by anticipating or critically commenting upon her thesis of symbiosis .She explains how the idea of the symbiotic origin of the eukaryotic cell was formulated.She is honest about those aspects of her theory which remain controversial and have failed to receive widespread support. Worth reading as an introductory text. If only it was two or three times longer.
 
The autobiography of an idea ****
Some years ago, Margulis promoted a new concept in evolution. Complex life developed from the merging of microbial forms of life. Elements of the cell such as mitochondria, chloroplasts and other organelles came from small, simple lifeforms invading larger cells. The idea was a long time in gaining acceptance, but is now part of conventional evolutionary texts. In this book, she expands her earlier work with some accounts of her life as a scientist and wife of Carl Sagan. She also goes beyond her earlier work to advance a new thesis on the accelerator of evolution - sex. While many of her ideas are presented in more detail elsewhere, this book is a good, quick introduction to fuller accounts of her thinking.

Margulis is an innovator - forceful in imparting her ideas. She portrays herself as a rebel from early in her career, arguing here that she was sceptical of "genes in the nucleus determin[ing] all the characteristics of plants and animals." Her misgivings received scant support, however, without a replacement thesis. She found one in symbiosis - the association of multiple organisms. It took many years of investigation, including initial rejection of her attempts to publish, before the idea of SET [Serial Endoymbiosis Theory] found acceptance. So much attention had been focussed the DNA in the cell nucleus that organelle structure and function had been essentially overlooked as irrelevant. That these organelles might have been independent organisms at some point was too novel. Her account of the struggle to gain recognition is related as one of dogged persistence, nearly devoid of outside support .

Moving through an interesting discussion of life's origins, she dismisses the notion that forms of nucleic acids arose before simple cells. She finds the natural occurence of lipids [fats] as the more likely precursors of complex life, with RNA and DNA arising as a way to give these fat globules more survival ability. As with her earlier thesis, this one will generate controversy, something Margulis seems nutured on.

Her proposal about the emergence of sex will come as a surprise to most readers. In a word, she suggests sex resulting from cannibalism. In Margulis' view, certain microbes under stress, notably the absence of food, turned on each other for survival. The cannibalism was not always fully consummated, she suggests, but the beginnings of mixing genetic material was begun in the process. Incomplete cannibalism could lead to the formation of a new, more complex organism. If this process occurred often enough within a compatible group, the new organism, obviously larger than its predecessors, would be more fit to compete.

In conclusion, Margulis makes a strong case in favour of James Lovelock's Gaia concept. This might have been a non-sequitor in the hands of someone less able to deal with novel ideas. Margulis stresses that Gaia has been mistakenly viewed as Earth's biosphere acting as a single organism. She argues that Gaia really means a global network - a "system of organisms." The Gaia concept means the elements of the "system" are tightly entangled and extinctions weaken the structure. If the extinction rate exceeds the rate of recovery the system is endangered. It's interesting to note in light of her definition that the Gaia website still refers to it as a "superorganism," not a "system of organisms." This disparity doesn't detract from Margulis' presentation, which is admirably presented. She offers enough graphic support for the text to clarify or enhance her themes. In all, this is a fine mind-opener in thinking about the development of early life. Readable by anyone interested in life's history and processes.

 
Simple populist introductory text to 'symbiotic' theory ***
A reasonable introduction to Margulis' oeuvre, a clear though perhaps too simplistic account of potentially very important scientific theories - it's almost as entertaining trying to read between the lines as regards Margulis' former relationship with Carl Sagan, numerous little asides hint at a the not entirely 'disinterested' nature of the scientist! Nice to see the scientific ego struggling to contain itself...
 
Excellent! *****
A very well written book suitable for the layperson up to the professional. Gives a clear explanation of her endosymbiotic theory of eukaryote evolution.

An enjoyable read!

 
Talks too much, says too little ****
I cannot say the book has no value - it contains a lot of interesting stuff which I enjoyed reading - I learned many new things. What annoyed me much was the extra autobiographical content that was totally useless to me. I didn't want autobiography, I wanted popular science book. IMHO, the book's content could have been delivered in half of its size. It's nice sometimes to have a little "behind the scenes" stuff, but this book certainly overdose it. However, although you might complain the extraneous content, the book is well written. You won't be bored.
 
The Biology Teachers Should Read! *****
Its a good pool of (r)evolutionary ideas about life on Earth. "Symbiotic Planet" bring us old (but not solved) questions again like "what is life?" and "How do the life beings evolve?" The symbiotic approach of "merged" beings could be useful to explain a lot of tricky mysteries of evolution. This book make us realize how uncertain and out of sense is the biologic "knowledge" teached in our schools and could be compared (in some terms) with darwinian's theory social impact when faced to the Bible's theory of life. Let's change the text books in high school!

Tachyos.org  |  Chronon Critical Points  |  Recent Science Book Reviews