Show Book List  | More books by Tim Maudlin

Reviews from Amazon
Amazon.com (0199218218) 1 review
A selection of these reviews is given below

Reviews elsewhere on the web:
Richard Healey

Tim Maudlin

The Metaphysics within Physics

The Metaphysics within Physics is a collection of essays written by Tim Maudlin over a period of about a decade, arguing for what might be thought of as the 'common sense' philosophy on the nature of laws within science.

Maudlin believes that the laws of physics are ontologically primitive and that the flow of time is ontologically primitive. This is contrasted in the book with the Humean point of view that the universe is made up of local 'happenings' and that the physical laws and even the flow of time are devised by us to try to make sense of this. I read this book as someone from a physics background wanting to find out more about the philosophical discussions dealing with the subject, and I felt that this book was a bit more straightforward than some I have seen. True you can still sometimes get lost amoung the counterfactuals, but Maudlin does use easy to grasp examples during the discussion, and what it more, examples that are based in real physics. Hence the title of the book, Maudlin feels that philosophers should know more about modern physics, not simply as the subject matter of what they are discussing, but also as a source of new ways of thinking about the world. In particular chapter 3, ' Suggestions from Physics for Deep Metaphysics' puts forward this argument. I would also recommend chapter 4, 'On the passing of Time' to those with an interest in the philosophy of time.

Amazon.com info
Hardcover 192 pages  
ISBN: 0199218218
Salesrank: 1052651
Weight:0.75 lbs
Published: 2007 Oxford University Press, USA
Amazon price $51.98
Marketplace:New from $44.00:Used from $45.54
Buy from Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk info
Hardcover 192 pages  
ISBN: 0199218218
Salesrank: 1082449
Weight:0.75 lbs
Published: 2007 Clarendon Press
Amazon price £35.15
Marketplace:New from £29.60:Used from £35.13
Buy from Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca info
Hardcover 192 pages  
ISBN: 0199218218
Salesrank: 505075
Weight:0.75 lbs
Published: 2007 Oxford University Press
Amazon price CDN$ 67.31
Marketplace:New from CDN$ 60.81:Used from CDN$ 67.28
Buy from Amazon.ca






Product Description
What fundamental account of the world is implicit in physical theory? Physics straightforwardly postulates quarks and electrons, but what of the more intangible elements, such as laws of nature, universals, causation and the direction of time? Do they have a place in the physical structure of the world?

Tim Maudlin argues that the ontology derived from physics takes a form quite different from those most commonly defended by philosophers. Physics postulates irreducible fundamental laws, eschews universals, does not require a fundamental notion of causation, and makes room for the passage of time. In a series of linked essays The Metaphysics Within Physics outlines an approach to metaphysics opposed to the Humean reductionism that motivates much analytical metaphysics.
 
metaphysics for scientists ****
Maudlin's Metaphysics within Physics sweeps away some of the philosophical cobwebs that entangle anyone trying to develop a coherent metaphysical position. A few threads in that web are Kant, Hume, Carnap, Lewis, empiricism, logical positivism, etc.

The book pulls together five essays of the author on causation, time and laws of nature. It is argued that traditional philosophical ontologies must yield to scientific descriptions of nature, whenever these descriptions do not translate well into the traditional framework. The Humean picture of a vast mosaic of local matters of fact -- instantiated at points -- should be replaced by a global structure with non-local connections. In Maudlin's picture, scientific laws and the direction of time are fundamental and are not suitable for philosophical analysis.

My favorite essays were "Suggestions for Deep Metaphysics" which describes the metaphysical implications of gauge theories, and "Causation, Counterfactuals, and the Third Factor", which demolishes the counterfactual analysis of causation due to David Lewis. The counterfactual treatment has always seemed like rubbish to me, and I never understood its popularity among philosophers.

The best quote followed a critique of Occam's Razor (p 4). "Let others subsist on the thin gruel of minimalist metaphysics: I'll take my ontology mit Schlag." -- a good motto for those who are not attracted to weird deflationary and minimalist philosophies.

Tachyos.org  |  Chronon Critical Points  |  Recent Science Book Reviews