Show Book List

Reviews from Amazon
Amazon.com (0375727728) 14 reviews
Amazon.com (0224062530) 14 reviews
A selection of these reviews is given below

 

Dan Rockmore

Stalking the Riemann Hypothesis

Mathematicians, both professional and amateur, find the study of the primes fascinating. However, there are still aspects of them which are not well understood, of which the Riemann Hypothesis is an example. The first part of this book discusses each of the main contributors to the subject, and shows how the different aspects of the Riemann hypothesis fit together. It then gets on to more current work, showing links to some surprising areas of study. Rockmore does an excellent job of making mathematics accessible to the non-mathematician readers, and I cna't help thinking that maybe the eventual solution to the problem will come from someone inspired by this book.

I was a bit irritated at first by the aversion to the use of equations in this book. However, I began to realise that this wasn't in fact so important, as if you want equations they are available elsewhere, and Rockmore does make good use of diagrams and graphs. Also I felt that he gives a much better explanation of the link between the zeros of the zeta function and the distribution of the primes than other books I have read. The final chapter summarizes the current state of work in the area, but it is very short. For instance the work of de Branges is only mentioned briefly - I think Rockmore is keeping away from this controversy.

Amazon.com info
Paperback 304 pages  
ISBN: 0375727728
Salesrank: 750341
Weight:0.5 lbs
Published: 2006 Vintage
Amazon price $14.95
Marketplace:New from $7.50:Used from $3.13
Buy from Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk info
Hardcover 288 pages  
ISBN: 0224062530
Salesrank: 405469
Weight:1.32 lbs
Published: 2005 Jonathan Cape Ltd
Amazon price £12.34
Marketplace:New from £11.84:Used from £8.00
Buy from Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca info
Paperback 304 pages  
ISBN: 0375727728
Salesrank: 317764
Weight:0.5 lbs
Published: 2006 Vintage
Amazon price CDN$ 15.33
Marketplace:New from CDN$ 8.46:Used from CDN$ 7.99
Buy from Amazon.ca

Product Description
For 150 years the Riemann hypothesis has been the holy grail of mathematics. Now, at a moment when mathematicians are finally moving in on a proof, Dartmouth professor Dan Rockmore tells the riveting history of the hunt for a solution.

In 1859 German professor Bernhard Riemann postulated a law capable of describing with an amazing degree of accuracy the occurrence of the prime numbers. Rockmore takes us all the way from Euclid to the mysteries of quantum chaos to show how the Riemann hypothesis lies at the very heart of some of the most cutting-edge research going on today in physics and mathematics.
 
Lacks clarity and focus **
I don't know what it is with the latest books trying to popularize certain branches of contemporary and modern science, but it seems to me that poetic and decorated language now sells better than scientific clarity and educational value. This book serves more as a general overview into a wide range of more or less related open and solved problems in mathematics and physics rather than an interesting introduction into the problem of prime number distribution and the Riemann hypothesis. The many analogies, which are often explained in too much detail, do not only distract from the main topic, but often lack a considerable amount of relevance. In several cases they don't even lead to any meaningful conclusion for the particular problem at hand. Near the end of the book, the author somewhat succeeds to "close the circle", but overall this work leaves much to be desired. In my opinion a great opportunity to explain the book's topic to a general audience was missed.
 
Not surprising to read other reviews here **
How do you write a book about mathematics and numbers without any? I got lost in the sea of abstract forced analogies and ended up more confused, irritated, and lost than I had when I began reading the book. 80 pages into the book, I give up and will read Derbyshire's book, about which I have read good things.

Disclaimer: I am not a mathematician by training but have a science/engineering background. Even if I did not understand all the details, I had hoped the book would at least grip my attention and make me want to learn more.

What a contrast (and a frustrating one at that) attempting to read this book was...especially considering I just finished reading QED - The strange theory of light and matter by Richard Feynman. There couldn't be two contrasting writing styles!
 
A diverging book! *
I felt very irritated by reading this book. Many analogies and side stories lead to loose the focused main subject. Stories always diverge, never converge to any meaningful understanding. Avoiding equations and narrative description of the content of equations rather makes even difficult to understand. Simply showing equations is much better. A very badly organized poor book
 
forget it *
This wasn't any good as a hardback and reissuing it
in paperback doesn't change matters.
To get an idea of what you are in for, see the reviews
of the hardback version.
Bottom line: don't waste your money.
 
Sniffing is really Asymmetrical Time Reversal *****
You can see why the Riemann Hypothesis allegedly led to John Nash's label of mental instability. This book is the best math book out there and it's definitely out there. All the best mathematicians should go insane but then hopefully make it back to acceptable society (without having to undergo secret CIA drug experiments like the Unabomber did at Harvard).

And so we STALK -- but what exactly? That's the point isn't it? (to conjure up Dedekind, Godel, Cantor, and so many other greats that challenged the norms of demented ecstasy).

I think the grand message of this book is that not only do we get a very clear and concise overview of the whole history of mathematics but in the end we find out that the logic on which math is based is totally a mystery.

Call it the "abduction" logic, as created by C.S. Pierce (a sort of intuitive inference). Nevertheless the promo by Professor Strogatz (on the first edition) calls the Riemann Hypothesis a conspiracy which F.W. Schelling would say is totally accurate -- a great spiral of asymmetrical time reversal arising out of pure empty awareness.

It appears that math has always been a spectator sport, that the grand paradoxes created by Euler really were proofs for God, that all the power based on math really is an illusion.

Tachyos.org  |  Chronon Critical Points  |  Recent Science Book Reviews