Show Book List  | More books by John Waller

Reviews from Amazon
Amazon.com (0198609396) 1 review
Amazon.co.uk (0198609396) 6 reviews
A selection of these reviews is given below

Reviews elsewhere on the web:
Guardian Unlimited
John Henry
Nature
Graham Connor
Gert Korthof

John Waller

Fabulous Science

Famous scientists often get a rather heroic image in later accounts of their work. In Fabulous science John Waller looks at the truth behind some of these stories. In the first part he looks at experiments such as Eddington's eclipse expedition to test general relativity, and shows that these weren't as conclusive as is often claimed. The second part looks at how history has treated various scientists - for instance Alexander Fleming, who is seen as the discoverer of Penicillin, despite not being the first person to notice it's effects nor being responsible for its development into a useful drug. Waller's examination of the details of such stories makes for an informative and enjoyable read.

Sometimes Waller goes to far in the other direction, and seems to be putting scientists up upon a pedestal merely to be able to knock them down again. However, this tendency decreases as the book goes on, (and Waller does much better in avoiding it in his later work Leaps in the dark).

Several of the chapters involve a religious element - with Waller showing that the science/religion divide is usually not as wide as the stories claim. He puts forward the idea that this divide was largely the result of a campaign in the second half of the nineteenth century by those who wanted to professionalize science by excluing amateurs such as clergymen.

Amazon.com info
Paperback 308 pages  
ISBN: 0198609396
Salesrank: 911399
Weight:0.49 lbs
Published: 2004 Oxford University Press
Marketplace:New from $13.69:Used from $8.59
Buy from Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk info
Paperback 308 pages  
ISBN: 0198609396
Salesrank: 93111
Weight:0.49 lbs
Published: 2004 OUP Oxford
Amazon price £6.99
Marketplace:New from £4.19:Used from £3.98
Buy from Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca info
Paperback 308 pages  
ISBN: 0198609396
Salesrank: 556028
Weight:0.49 lbs
Published: 2004 Oxford University Press
Marketplace:New from CDN$ 35.52:Used from CDN$ 17.07
Buy from Amazon.ca

Product Description
The great biologist Louis Pasteur suppressed 'awkward' data because it didn't support the case he was making. John Snow, the 'first epidemiologist' was doing nothing others had not done before. Gregor Mendel, the supposed 'founder of genetics' never grasped the fundamental principles of 'Mendelian' genetics. Joseph Lister's famously clean hospital wards were actually notorious dirty. And Einstein's general relativity was only 'confirmed' in 1919 because an eminent British scientist cooked his figures. These are just some of the revelations explored in this book. Drawing on current history of science scholarship, "Fabulous Science" shows that many of our greatest heroes of science were less than honest about their experimental data and not above using friends in high places to help get their ideas accepted. It also reveals that the alleged revolutionaries of the history of science were often nothing of the sort. Prodigiously able they may have been, but the epithet of the 'man before his time' usually obscures vital contributions made their unsung contemporaries and the intrinsic merits of ideas they overturned. These distortions of the historical record mostly arise from our tendency to read the present back into the past. But in many cases, scientists owe their immortality to a combination of astonishing effrontery and their skills as self-promoters.
 
Science's Seamy Side *****
The science establishment admits that science is an `industry' exposed to market pressures: relentless demand for usable output, the need to promote its products and to parry bad publicity, the need to reconcile conflicts of interest between marketable research outcomes and validity of those outcomes (especially acute in the pharmaceutical industry). Today bogus science so widespread that the catchphrase `junk science' has become a label to nullify the prestige of the `science' label adeptly used to recruit the credibility of the naïve or the uninformed. Another effect is the nearly universal institution of codes of conduct to for scientists.

Waller bypasses this contemporary territory to come at his theme in a series of case studies of historically high profile achievements that have proved to be somewhat inflated, or outright `fabulous'. Among his cases are Louis Pasteur's disproof of spontaneous generation, Arthur Eddington's experimental proof of Einstein's general relativity theory, Joseph Lister's introduction of surgical antisepsis; Alexander Fleming's discovery of penicillin, Robert Millikan's discovery of the electron, and Darwin's `proof' of evolution. In each case the author identifies the legend to be corrected and then takes us inside the story of what actually happened. We are shown something of the personalities of the scientists involved and their motivation. The lesson concludes with guesses about why they behaved as they did and how they got away with it. I'll mention just one of Waller's cases.

It is the famous debate between Bishop Samuel Wilberforce and Thomas Huxley at a session of the 1860 British Association for the Advancement of Science, held in Oxford. According to legend, the encounter occurred before a packed auditorium filled by anticipation of a confrontation between the eloquent Wilberforce, defending the permanence of species, and Huxley, defending evolution. Legend says that Wilberforce displayed his ignorance of Darwin's theory and was trounced and humiliated by the acerbic Huxley. The legendary debate condenses to an aphorism: Wilberforce taunted Huxley with the question whether he was descended from the ape on his father's side or his mother's side, to which Huxley retorted that he would rather be descended from an ape than from an august authority who abused his trust to obfuscate the truth. The devastating reply shifted the audience from partiality to the orthodox view to up-and-coming evolutionism. This had the larger significance that, for the first time, science openly challenged religion and proclaimed the two modes of thought must go separate ways. As Hallam puts it: `The [debate] ...was a landmark in the victory of scientific reason over faith and obfuscation. At least that is how Huxley & Co saw it. Were they right? Well, not exactly.'

First slippage: three journalists reported the session, but none mentioned the Wilberforce ape ancestry challenge and the Huxley rejoinder. Indeed, Huxley had said in previous conference sessions that he was not ashamed to admit his pithacoid ancestry. Second slippage: the `inextinguishable laughter' from the audience that Huxley, in correspondence, boasted that his retort produced is not reported by the journalists or others who commented on the event. These sources include Darwin's supporters Charles Lyell and Joseph Hooker. Third slippage: the session was not billed as a debate between Huxley and Wilberforce, but as a paper on the historical conflict between science and religion by one Dr John Draper, to be followed by open discussion. The audience expected Wilberforce to speak, but not Huxley, who attended the meeting only on a last minute decision. Fourth slippage: According to a statement in correspondence shortly after the event, Huxley's argument was not particularly effective or audible to the large audience. Wilberforce was indeed put down, but by botanist Joseph Hooker. The source? Joseph Hooker in a letter to Darwin! Fifth slippage: there is no record of what Wilberforce said, but we do have his review of the Origin that appeared shortly after the Oxford meeting. There he shows himself well acquainted with Darwin's book. Invoking his ecclesiastical office, he expressly defended Darwin's right to be heard. He accepted the principle of natural selection, but says that it is a well-known principle of species conservation (by eliminating the maladapted). He argued that Darwin simply recycled the opinions of his grandfather, Erasmus Darwin. Sixth slippage: Wilberforce's comments on the session express satisfaction that he had met the challenge handsomely. Waller's conclusion: Huxley's boastful letter, on which the legend is based, was a `face-saving device' of a man so immobilized by anger that he couldn't effectively speak. So Huxley was fibbing. In particular, his contention that Wilberforce engaged in deliberate obfuscation is unfounded. Waller concludes that the audience was fairly evenly divided between the two sides, each confident in its opinion. My own investigation of this debate reached the same conclusion, but with one difference: that it occurred at all, under British Association auspices, was a landmark in the transition to public acceptance of evolution. In that sense, the legend communicates a historical truth, but dressed in the mystique of the Darwin cult.

Fabulous Science a readable expedition into the exotic world of how science happens. Definitely merits a place on your wish list.
 
simply good *****
There's lots one could say about this book - thoroughly researched, intellectually sound, accessible language, engaging topic...But quite simply, all it comes down to is that it's a thoroughly enjoyable read.
 
Science for the non scientist *****
As a non scientist and having dropped history before GCSE I approached this book with apprehension, however after the first chapter I was hooked.
It takes icons of the last few centuries and examines in detail why we know their names so well, which so often is not because of the work they were made famous for.
Waller writes with clarity and structure covering the fields of medicine, science and business. This book is well worth reading and gives you an insight into the dark world of discoveries.
 
Revelations ****
This is a scholarly work and the information given is completely credible even though it differs from what most of us have come to believe about the scientists he covers. For each person Waller first gives the accepted story then proceeds to blow it to pieces - but always in a kindly way. We all love a good story and no doubt history is manipulated to make the best of what happened which, in reality, is often mundane.
Anyone who is interested in science should read this book - it will make one look at evidence a bit more critically in future. It is very readable and the enormous amount of work which has gone into it does not detract from the enjoyment.
 
Truth and Fable *****
“Fabulous Science” changes our assumptions not only about the supposedly revolutionary discoveries of the past but also about its great controversies.
Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, for example, was “proven” by Arthur Eddington in 1919 on evidence too shaky to convict a horse thief. Dr. Joseph Lister, the nineteenth century advocate of hygiene, lost patients in surgery because he was unaware of the importance of cleanliness in his wards. Charles Darwin followed Jean-Baptiste Lamarck in believing in the inheritance of acquired characteristic more than in simple survival of the fittest, while Gregor Mendel had no concept of “Mendelian” genetics.
The surprise is that the heroes whom John Waller depicts with such brutal realism become more admirable by being more human.
As for the controversies of the past, we find, for example, that the grand debate between theology and science owes more to the dramatisation of later historians than to any serious division among those involved.
Waller has the rare gift of being able to wear his learning lightly while imparting it easily. If the history of science has been wrapped in fable, the reality is no less wonderful than the mythologies that were created. For the scientist and the historian, this book is essential reading.
 
fables and facts *****
The book reveals science as the collective evolution of knowledge rather than the work of a few intellectual giants. As John Waller writes, "believing that single individuals are capable of such tremendous accomplishments is also to ignore the fact that science is best viewed as a never-ending, multi-participant marathon, not a series of high-profile relays."

The surprise is that the result's so entertaining. In Waller's highly readable prose, the book is like a collection of reverse detective stories. We learn of the remarkable deductive feats of an Hercule Poirot or a Sherlock Holmes of science (such as Louis Pasteur or Robert Millikan) only to learn that the great detective selected evidence to support a theory which happened to be right, the solution confirmed not by a single stroke of brilliance but the by the hard slog of police procedural investigation.

If myths are debunked, the heroes of science become no less admirable in being revealed as human. Though some like Sir Alexander Fleming take harder falls, there is surely no insult in seeing Gregor Mendel and Charles Darwin as men of their time, bound by the knowledge of the time. To claim, as our mythology suggests, that by miraculous prescience they ignored existing theories is hardly flattering. We learn instead that Mendel was no Mendelian and that Darwin accepted much of the evolutionary beliefs of Lamarck.

For the student of history or science, "Fabulous Science" is likely to soon become required reading.


Tachyos.org  |  Chronon Critical Points  |  Recent Science Book Reviews