Show Book List  | More books by Janna Levin

Reviews from Amazon
Amazon.com (1400032407) 38 reviews
Amazon.co.uk (1400032407) 3 reviews
Amazon.ca (1400032407) 1 review
A selection of these reviews is given below

Reviews elsewhere on the web:
Helium.com
International Herald Tribune
New York Times
Times Online
Alex Kasman
Anna Clark

Janna Levin

A madman dreams of Turing machines

Kurt Godel and Alan Turing were two of the most prominent mathematicians of the twentieth century, but their desire for privacy means that it is hard for a biography to tell what they were really like. Janna Levin solves this problem by making clear that much of what she is writing is fiction. In A madman dreams of Turing machines she tells their stories.

Thus we hear of Turing's troubled life at school, at of Gödel's entry into the Vienna Circle, and of how well his ideas were accepted. The book goes on to tell of Turing's vital work during the World War II in decoding the Enigma machine code, and of the problems he faced due to his homosexuality, eventually resulting in his suicide. We find out about how Gödel's paranoia meant that it took great effort from his wife Adele to get him to eat anything, and how when she becomes too ill to feed him he gradually starves himself to death.

So how well does the fictional account work? I liked the way that Levin combined her own musings about the nature of reality with those of her partially fictional characters. Unfortunately I felt that this was overshadowed by more of the book being about the lives of two misfits - I wasn't so keen on this. Certainly if you want to find out a bit about Gödel and Turing's lives without having to plough through lots of maybe's then I would say that this book is close enough to reality to be worth reading.

Amazon.com info
Paperback 240 pages  
ISBN: 1400032407
Salesrank: 92895
Weight:0.5 lbs
Published: 2007 Anchor
Amazon price $10.20
Marketplace:New from $6.92:Used from $3.30
Buy from Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk info
Paperback 240 pages  
ISBN: 1400032407
Salesrank: 624008
Weight:0.5 lbs
Published: 2007 Anchor Books
Marketplace::Used from £7.43
Buy from Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca info
Paperback 240 pages  
ISBN: 1400032407
Salesrank: 162197
Weight:0.5 lbs
Published: 2007 Anchor
Amazon price CDN$ 12.78
Marketplace:New from CDN$ 5.62:Used from CDN$ 3.95
Buy from Amazon.ca






Product Description
Kurt Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems sent shivers through Vienna’s intellectual circles and directly challenged Ludwig Wittgenstein’s dominant philosophy. Alan Turing’s mathematical genius helped him break the Nazi Enigma Code during WWII. Though they never met, their lives strangely mirrored one another—both were brilliant, and both met with tragic ends. Here, a mysterious narrator intertwines these parallel lives into a double helix of genius and anguish, wonderfully capturing not only two radiant, fragile minds but also the zeitgeist of the era.
 
Amazingly Brilliant ****
The text is amazingly brilliant. Very well written and glued & will surely expand your vocabulary. Although a novel, it is still (mostly) based on solid and true facts. Only where necessary were the facts altered or modified for the sake of cohesion.
Alternating between Godel & Turing, the reader can get a bit confused for a while but will soon get his grips on the text , specially that the last part is dominated by the details of Turing's war-time life until his self-prepared cold death.
A great book highly suggested to everyone who has no or very little idea of these two brilliant mathematicians [& philosophers]. It can serve as a first book or introduction to their lives and work in a very interesting, entertaining & enlightening way.
 
Waste of time *
The author's ego gets in the way of the narrative. Read Godel Escher Bach instead,
 
A Madman Dreams of Turin Machines *****
Book arrived fast in excellent condition. Also sent a copy to a friend. Very satisfied.
 
A Serious Look at Uncertainty *****

As I read it, Janna Levin's novel is a creative exploration of epistemology, the problem of knowing. It briefly but vividly sketches the lives of two men, Kurt Gödel and Alan Turing, and uses their assumptions about reality and the nature of truth to dramatize that certainty about most aspects of existence, and especially about the larger questions of value and meaning, is unattainable. The novel confronts serious questions: Is our existence meaningful or meaningless? What role, if any, should faith and mysticism play in our lives? How reliable is the knowledge gained by a priori reasoning? By inductive empiricism? What constitutes reliable knowledge and how do we go about obtaining it?

The first chapter introduces members of the Vienna Circle who in the early twentieth century approach the problem of knowing with the hyper-scientific standards of Logical Positivism. Disciples of Wittgenstein, they wish to discard all unexamined assumptions and build a world-view that is incontestable. The only claims of truth they consider fully reliable are claims founded on empirical observations and the unassailable logic of mathematics. They meet to "distinguish science from superstition. At stake is Everything. Reality. Meaning. Their lives. . . . They hate mysticism and metaphysics, religion and faith. They loathe them. They want to separate out truth" (8-9). They engage in "ripping down notions like `The Absolute,' `Spirit,' and `God' and watched them vaporize before hitting the ground. Faith, Mysticism - it's not that these ideas are false. They are meaningless" (59). But Kurt Gödel, a member of the Circle, shatters their illusions of certainty by demonstrating that some truths are beyond mathematics. Previous philosophers had believed this was true, but their ideas were only beliefs. "Gödel didn't believe that truth would elude us. He proved that it would" with a theorem that met the epistemological standards of the Vienna Circle, his theorem being as tangible as "a rock he had dug up from the ground. He could pass it around the table and it would be as real as the rock." Ironically, what the Positivists considered to be one of the most powerful means of establishing "truth" - the rational system of mathematics - is proven to be "not a complete one" (10-11) and Logical Positivism finds itself undermined by its own principles.

Throughout the novel the problem of knowing is approached in a number of ways and with far more complexity than I can describe here. Gödel, for example, engages in a debate with Olga over the distinction between what is true and what is real, and he accepts the truth and reality of an abstract realm of numbers (84). But he is "completely convinced" of the clairvoyance of a Gypsy medium (62) in apparent violation of his own epistemological standards. And Moritz Schlick, the leader of the Vienna Circle and its link with Wittgenstein, can find no way to prove that his own sensory experience is valid (74), instantiating what philosophers for centuries have called the "problem of the external world." This problem of sensory reliability, particularly in the form of seeing, is raised and/or symbolized many times. Numerous other epistemological issues appear in the novel, each showing another facet of the problem of determining truth.

Over in England in the same time frame, Alan Turing gradually undergoes a conversion from religious faith to empirical skepticism and concludes, "We are biological machines. Nothing more. We have no souls, no spirit. But we are bound to mathematics and mathematics is flawless. This has to be true. Where is God in 1 + 1 = 2? There is no God" (107). Turing uses logic and mathematics to invent a computing machine and successfully break Nazi war codes, clearly not inconsequential feats. But Gödel's and Turing's stories illustrate not only that certainty about many religious and philosophical issues is unobtainable, but also that formidable powers of logic are insufficient in themselves as tools for living. Both men's lives end in a kind of tragic and pitiable madness.

The novel raises the question, "Are our lives meaningful or meaningless?" and uses historical data to conclude that no answer can be given with certainty. Religious faith as a means of knowing is implicitly if not explicitly rejected as unreliable. The narrator describes herself as "Craving an amulet, a jewel, a reason, a purpose, a truth" (220), but can find no reason to embrace any explanation of reality as a certainty. All explanations must be seen as corrigible and provisional. Certainty even about the material, historical world is no more accessible than certainty about a putative metaphysical realm. How does one determine where to begin a biography? Where does that person's story actually begin? Where does it end? Our lives are the result of and the cause of indeterminable numbers of chains of cause and effect; there are no clear lines of demarcation, no points that clearly identify where a story starts or finishes. The book opens with "There is no beginning. I've tried to invent one but it was a lie" (3). It closes with, "There is no ending. I tried to invent one but it was a lie" (220). These are not the words of an unreliable narrator. Quite the opposite. These are the words of a narrator completely committed to speaking truthfully and courageously admitting that, despite our craving for certainty, incontestable "truth" is a will-o'-the-wisp that still eludes us. This is a valuable reminder in an age of unprecendented dangers arising from political and religious absolutism.
 
Not easy writing fiction - - *
I also wonder how A.A. Knopf could rationalize funding this book; do they do vanity books?
Admittedly fiction is usually about something, probably from the author's life, otherwise it would be pure abstraction like W. Burroughs (which is even harder to do).
But this book by a novice is borrrring. But, in the spirit of art criticism, keep writing. It's no sin to write a boring book.
I'm not a professional writer, but to offer constructive criticism, there are no juicy parts to this book; such as with Joan Clarke and Alan Turing. And the parts about Godel are not researched and detailed enough; where is a reference to Godel saving his library receipts? Fiction writers, among themselves, like to read lots of declarative details, like all about the clothes someone is wearing etc.
It would seem to me, the only people interested in this book, from the title, would be those knowing what Turing and Godel accomplished. Being in this category myself, I was sucked in thinking there would be something worthwhile. Art is supposed to offer some different or extended view or possiblity. This was more like a soap opera.
 
Madman Dreams of Turing Machines **
I bought this one because I had read "The Semantics of Murder" by Aifric Campbell and was interested in reading other novels about the Vienna Circle. Brilliant and eccentric scientists are perfect hunting ground for novelists but the difference is that Levin is a professor of physics and this is her first novel. The book has some serious structural flaws - the first person narrator who intrudes upon the story is completely superfluous to requirements. But as character study of genius and obsession the portraits of Kurt Godel and Alan Turing are compelling and lovingly done. There are wonderful vignettes - Wittgenstein for example - and pre-war Vienna is powerfully re-created.
 
Almost as good as its title ****
A compelling and haunting début. Compelling despite the headlines, despite the fact that it is 'faction', written by a young, talented and attractive female physicist, dealing in numbers and maths and things us normals can't grasp, and despite the expectation that it couldn't be as good as its title. It is compelling because Janna Levin is a very good writer. Despite their extreme contrasts, neither Turing nor Gödel descend into caricature or hyperbolic farce. They cut haunting figures not because they are great logicians but because their frailties seem so palpable, even minor, in the context of their times and thought. The book's occasional weakness is a certain upbeat insistence on the metaphysics of the math - of worlds turned upside down by abstract thought and revelations that shake the foundations of science. It is not so much that this doesn't work (it does) or that it unmasks Levin as a dry mathematician playing at literature (she displays a quite stunning turn of phrase, decent pacing and an accomplished eye for the human). On the contrary, the weakness is a tendency to oversimplify and infantilise the intellectual dimensions of Turing and Gödel, to render what they struggled with simple enough for us to understand quickly, and hence not worth the angst. Moments smack of worthiness, of 'A Madman Dreams...' as a gateway drug to Principa Mathematica or late Wittgenstein. The result is that, if anything, the logical and mathematical dimensions are undersold. A little bolder, a little more comfortable with the reader having to wrestle with the concepts, a little less self-conscious, and this would have been not only compelling but stunning.
 
A Truly Poor Work *
Though on a very interesting subject, this is a truly poorly written book, adopting the style of a cheap romance novel. Much of the book reads like a fifteen year old girl's high school writing assignment:

"The Cafe Josephinum is a smell first, a stinging smell of roasted Turkish beans too heavy to waft on air and so waiting instead for the more powerful current of steam blown off the surface of boiling saucers fomenting to coffee. By merely snorting the vapors out of the air, patrons become overstimulated. The cafe appears in the brain as this delicious, muddy scent first, awaking a memory of the shifting room of mirrors second--the memory nearly as energetic as the actual sight of the room, which appears in the mind only third. The coffee is a fuel to power ideas. A fuel for the anxious hope that the harvest of art and words and logic will be the richest ever because only the most fecund season will see them through the siege of this terrible winter and the siege of that terrible war."

...and somehow manages to make the stories of Turing and Goedel incomprehensible and tedious. How this book received good reviews from the press is an absolute mystery. One of the only books I have ever felt compelled to throw away after finishing.
 
Could not get past the first 50 pages **
Alan Turing and Kurt Godel were two of the greatest mathematical minds of the 20th Century, if not of all time. Not surprisingly, these two brilliant men had more than a few personality quirks. Leven tries to create a novel, not even a historical fiction, really, based on the two men's lives.

I could not get past Leven's overwrought prose, and gave up after about 50 pages. The book sounded interesting to me -- I've read and enjoyed Hofstadter's Godel, Escher, Bach, for example -- but after fighting through 50 pages of this book, I am not so sure I like the idea any more. Perhaps a writer like Hofstadter could pull it off, but Leven certainly cannot.

Tachyos.org  |  Chronon Critical Points  |  Recent Science Book Reviews